The Bad Luck of the Irish In the early days of Sir Alfred Hitchcock’s career, when he was still experimenting with type of story and struggling to discern his course, he tried out many different scenarios which, for the enthusiast today who only knows him by his most famous films, the masterpieces, and knows him as ‘The Master of Suspense’, would be quite surprising. It’s all a ruse. Which he promptly did for Murder. Hitchcock never actually directed this. Hitchcock adapted Sean O’Casey’s play but the end results are fairly poor. This is an odd one. With a strict fidelity to the original source, this film does feel rather static and stage-bound in places, but has some marvellous sequences:
Juno and the Paycock is based on a play by Sean O’Casey; Hitchcock, most likely, tried to retain that simplistic quality where the bulk of the film takes place in a single room, which I…. Hitchcock never actually directed this. They start leading a rich life forgetting what the most important values of are. This review may contain spoilers. The story is about a dysfunctional family, the Boyles, the father is a loafer who spends time drinking with his…. I can handle the truth. This is not to discount Hitchcock’s contribution but the Master had his three-decade streak coming so this can be seen as an early warm-up with the then-rising sound technology, but the film is as close to Hitch’ universe as Walt Disney is to Russ Meyer. Though I’m half-Irish myself, it’s a rather boring, stage-bound story which doesn’t lend itself readily to cinematic appeal.
Juno and the Paycock is based on a play by Sean O’Casey; Hitchcock, most likely, tried to retain that simplistic quality ppaycock the bulk of the film takes place in a single room, which I….
Hitchcock wnd this film from the play of the same name and respected the author…. It’s up to the mother Sara Allgood to try and keep everyone together and that includes her drunken husband Edward Chapman.
It’s all talk, talk, talk, talk, no camera movement, talk, talk, talk, talk, talk, no camera movement, talk, talk, talk, meanwhile people walk through frame from right to left, no camera movement, talk, talk, talk,zzzzzzzzz, what did I miss?! This plays to the strengths of the source and makes sure it is easy to follow for those, such as myself, who are not used to films of this era.
However, things may not be looking up for the family as suspected at first glance. Hitchcock never actually directed this.
Based on a successful play, the film keeps to the same feel with mostly static cameras used. The last scene is a mother weeping over her son’s body “riddled with bullets”. This is the worst film of his that I have seen.
Mostly throwaway comedy during the first hour and then its all pretty much tragedy until the end of the movie. In the early days of Sir Alfred Hitchcock’s career, when he was still experimenting with type of story and struggling to discern his course, he tried out many different scenarios which, for the enthusiast today who only knows him by his most famous films, the masterpieces, and knows him as ‘The Master of Suspense’, would be quite surprising.
Having seen a few of his later, more notable films, I sought out one of his earlier ones in order to see signs of the future to come. James Marchant Norman G. Though I’m half-Irish myself, it’s a rather boring, stage-bound story which doesn’t lend itself readily to cinematic appeal.
Juno and the Paycock subtitles
This review may contain spoilers. This is one bleak film. Right from the start, I know this film has something to say and themes to explore but it is done in such a poor and uninteresting way that all of the story’s power is wiped away. The difference is simple: Honestly, that’s what stuck with me the most.
With a strict fidelity to the original source, this film does feel rather static and stage-bound in places, but has some marvellous sequences: The film tells the story of a Scotish family who quickly begin to fall apart after getting a large inheritance. Those at the film studio accidentally put Hitchcock’s name in the credits and begged his permission to keep it there to avoid pacock to fix it.
They start leading a rich life forgetting what the most important values of are. The premise, that of a poor family who come into an inheritance and…. Naturally, it is very much Of The Times, politically and socially. Which he promptly did for Adn.
Juno and the Peacock () – Suevia Films (Portugal, ) – The Alfred Hitchcock Wiki
I never thought there would ever be a film from Hitchcock that would disappoint me. Studio British International Pictures. Hitchcock adapted Sibtitles O’Casey’s play but the end results are fairly poor. Juno and the Paycock. Juno and the Paycock is so incredibly dull that it couldn’t even hold my attention at least for a minute.
Channel names listed, subtitles should be provided for all non-English films on this list. A slight but funny Dramady that’s not what I was expecting from Hitchcock. Review In A Nutshell: First of all, the brain needs recalibrating to factor in that this is a ‘s film set in Ireland.
There’s no doubt he’s to blame for this mess of a film and I believe he pretty much disowned it later in his life. He certainly isn’t right for the material because after about ten-minutes you’ll realize that you’re in a talking mess of a film. This is an odd one. It’s a drama, and I think it would do better being remade, because the story is worth watching, but the enylish isn’t, you know what I mean? I go in and out of consciousness while watching this.
Alfred Hitchcock Alma Reville. 19930 leaves a rather large inheritance, which is a good thing because Captain Boyle Chapman is a lazy drunk and refuses to find a job while his wife Allgood tries to keep the family together despite a young daughter named Mary Kathleen O’Regan and an invalid son Laurie who may have done something horrible. The Bad Luck of the Irish Being a Hitchcock aficionado he’s my second-favourite director of all-timeI at least need to be a completist, watch every film he ever made, and decide its merits for myself.
Juno y el pavo real, The Shame of Mary Boyle. There is a thrill in seeing some of the original theatrical cast here. A poor Irish family is suddenly greeted by a young suitor, who has a will in hand by a distant relative, who has since passed away.
In return he would get a mulligan if needed in the future. Jujo all of these films share…. During the Irish revolution, a family earns a big inheritance. Outside of some great performances we’re left with a pretty bland and forgettable film that certainly wasn’t engllsh Hitchcock needed.
They must sell their home and start living like vagabonds. I can handle the truth. This is certainly one of those films where fans of the play will find a lot to enjoy here, whereas those unfamiliar with O’Casey’s work will see this as a contender for Hitchcock’s worst film which I believe it still is regardless, despite having a more substantial subitles than some of his lighter capers and thriller misfires.
At the end, they discover they will not receive that inheritance; the family is destroyed and penniless.